1. FFY 2018 Worksheet S-10 Audits
MACs will be auditing every DSH hospital’s UC listing for FFY 2018 (i.e., FYE 12/31/2018, 6/30/2019). Due to the COVID-19 crisis, audit deadlines are fluid. All hospitals currently in receipt of 2018 audit requests, are eligible to receive deadline extensions until May 15. All other DSH hospitals should anticipate receiving an audit notification the week of May 18.
Action Requested – COVID-19 Challenges
Please feel free to provide Toyon any information related to delays and/or the inability to produce information during these audits due to COVID-19. For instance, hospital personnel being on-site to pull large patient data files, charity care applications / approvals, etc. This also includes the delays due to hospital personnel working from home and/or prioritization of other work related to COVID-19. Please send any comments to Fred Fisher (contact information listed above).
2. Financial Assistance Policy (FAP) Updates
Hospitals may only report UC amounts on worksheet S-10 of the Medicare cost report if the discounts are specified in the FAP. As recent in the FFY 2020 IPPS Final Rule, CMS states:
“In Transmittal 10, we clarified that hospitals may include discounts given to uninsured patients who meet the hospital’s charity care criteria in effect for that cost reporting period …As a result, nothing prohibits a hospital from considering a patient’s insurance status as a criterion in its charity care policy. A hospital determines its own financial criteria as part of its charity care policy.”
A hospital’s determination of its own financial criteria thereby provides hospitals discretion on how patient financial discounts are articulated in the FAP. Whereas traditional FAPs are in plain language as public facing documents, the complex nature of cost reporting instructions now warrants the need for hospitals to craft policy disclosures related to the accounting of patient financial discounts. In this respect, Toyon has prepared template FAP language concerning emerging categories of UC cost. Any language ultimately adopted by providers should follow the approval procedure with hospital leadership / board of directors.
FAP – Discovery of Patient Financial Assistance Eligibility During Collections
Changes in revenue reduction under ASC Topic 606, may result in hospitals discovering additional charity care associated with patient accounts in collections. Typically, outstanding patient receivables relate to coinsurance, copayment and deducible (C+D) amounts. This is a significant population, considering when C+D are reported as charity care, these amounts are not reduced by the cost to charge ratio.
Example FAP language may state – In certain cases, further investigation is required to determine eligibility for patient financial assistance. If it is discovered a patient may qualify for a financial discount, and the patient’s balance is in billing/collections, the patient’s account will be returned from billing/collections. If it is determined the account is eligible for financial assistance, [provider] will reverse the account out of bad debt and document the associated charges as a patient financial discount.
FAP – Patients with Insurance Not Under Contract with Providers
CMS permits hospitals can include charges related to insured patients that do have a contractual relationship with the hospital. CMS states hospitals may report the following as uncompensated care:
“portion of the total charges, written off to charity care, for uninsured patients, and patients with coverage from an entity that does not have a contractual relationship with the provider who meet the hospital’s charity care policy or FAP.”
It is important to note CMS does not prescribe any further instruction or guidance on 1) when it is determined a payer is “under contract” nor 2) an industry standard for the determination of charges written-off as charity care for this category of patients.
Example FAP language may state – Negotiations with insurance carriers involving single case agreements for insured patients not under contract with [provider] will be conducted by leadership or representation of [provider]. Although [provider] may agree to the terms of the negotiations with insurance companies, a single case agreement is not representative of a patient “under contract” with [provider]. All unreimbursed amounts are a form of patient financial assistance and determined as the difference between gross hospital charges and hospital reimbursement.
FAP – Access to Healthcare Crisis
As the healthcare industry encounters COVID-19, providers may experience high volumes of care to the most critically vulnerable population of underinsured and uninsured patients. CMS only recognizes, and reimburses, for this charity if it is articulated in the FAP.
Example FAP language may state – An Access to Healthcare Crisis must be proclaimed by [hospital leadership / approved by the board of directors] and attached to this patient financial assistance document as an addendum. An Access to Healthcare Crisis may be related to an emergent situation whereby state / federal regulations are modified to meet the immediate healthcare needs of the hospital’s community during the Access to Healthcare Crisis. During an Access to Healthcare Crisis [provider] may “flex” its patient financial assistance policy to meet the needs of the community in crisis. These changes will be included in the patient financial assistance policy included as an addendum. Patient discounts related to an Access to Healthcare Crisis may be provided at the time of the crisis, regardless of the date of this policy (as hospital leadership may not be able to react quickly enough to update policy language in order to meet more pressing needs during the Access to Healthcare Crisis).
3. Current S-10 Reporting
Toyon recommends an annual evaluation is conducted each year to determine if an amended worksheet S-10 UC DSH listing is necessary. Through our experience with UC DSH audits, it is common to “refresh” and update the UC DSH listing after the cost report is filed, five months after the close of a hospital’s fiscal year. This is analogous to the process of reporting Medicare bad debts and the empirical DSH.
This annual evaluation and update is not to determine or reassess the charity and non-covered Medicaid write-offs that fall within the fiscal year, but rather to redetermine insurance coverage on charity and non-covered Medicaid claims. These determinations are important as they may impact:
· Charity care related to coinsurance, copayments and deductibles (C+D). These costs are reported on Worksheet S-10, Line 20 Column 2 (an important population to correctly identify, as these amounts are not reduced by a hospital’s cost to charge ratio); and
· The amount of non-covered/denied Medicaid charges reported with uninsured charity care on Worksheet S-10, Line 20, Column 1.
Charity care related to coinsurance, copayments and deductibles (C+D)
A significant step reporting UC DSH listing is to identify amounts related to charity C+D; these amounts are not reduced by the cost to charge ratio. Importantly, there is no industry standard on how these amounts are determined. CMS’ auditors review these amounts using an audit template inclusive of fields for hospital teams to populate for “insured” patients vs. “uninsured” patients. The process of obtaining insurance may take up to a year. Please consider:
· At the time of filing the UC DSH listing, five months after the fiscal year end, it may be determined certain patients were “uninsured”, therefore the amount written-off during the year is reported as charity on Worksheet S-0 Line 20, Column 1. This write-off amount is reduced by the cost to charge ratio.
· The determination of “uninsured” may be driven by the presence of certain transactional data, like an insurance payment.
· When certain patients subsequently obtain insurance, the hospital will have more accurate data (i.e., an insurance payment), five months after the cost report is filed.
· An amended UC DSH listing thereby allows accurate reporting of these charity care write-offs as “insured” to Worksheet Line 20, Column 2. This write-off amount is not reduced by the cost to charge ratio.
Toyon has experienced hospitals identifying larger amounts of charity to report as C+D by refreshing insurance status a year after filing the cost report. If CMS’s expectation is for hospitals to “smooth” this occurrence using a year over year adjustment, there is no industry standard. Moreover, any year over year smoothing efforts may be complex as they involve amounts reported as “uninsured” on Worksheet S-10 Line 20, Column 1 vs. “insured” on Worksheet Line 20, Column 2.
Non-Covered/Denied Medicaid Charges
The assessment of reporting non-covered/denied Medicaid accounts is an important part of Toyon’s annual evaluation to determine if an amended UC DSH listing is necessary. In many cases, identifying the charge write-off for non-covered Medicaid goes beyond the reported patient transaction amount. For instance, consider:
· The transaction amount may not always represent the charge write-off, instead it may represent the payment not received from Medicaid. Therefore, in some cases (i.e., when there is no Medicaid payment), it is more accurate to report total hospital charges as opposed to the transaction amount.
· There is no industry standard on how hospitals account for non-covered and denied Medicaid transactions. In circumstances when non-covered Medicaid accounts are written-off and reversed in transaction detail, this occurrence creates annual reporting anomalies when considering the reporting of total hospital charges vs. transaction amounts (year over year).
· Medicaid coverage and operations are state-specific, impacting the time it takes to processes Medicaid coverage/payments.
At the time of filing the UC DSH listing, five months after the fiscal year end, it may appear there is no Medicaid payment, and therefore a hospital may report the entire hospital charge as “uninsured” charity on Worksheet S-10, Line 20 Column 1. However, Medicaid may eventually make a payment, thereby making it improper to report the entire hospital charge. In other occasions, Medicaid may recoup payment, and it would be proper to report the entire hospital charge.
Toyon also recommends providers assess annual UC reporting for year over year consistency. CMS’s use of a single base year for UC funding may cause large variations in annual DSH funding. As hospital teams look for more predictability in annual payments, hospital teams may consider smoothing the timing of charity and bad debt write-offs so there is mitigated variation in UC cost from year to year (aside from other market conditions).
Toyon is committed to apprising providers with important reimbursement updates. Please contact Fred Fisher at 888.514.9312 or email@example.com if you have any questions.