Month / Year
Subject

Category: SCH

CARES Act Funding Update

HHS allocates $14 billion in targeted “Round Two” payments.
Toyon’s August Series of CARES Updates

Toyon is pleased to provide this update on the CARES Act Public Health and Social Services Emergency Fund (PHSSEF). Toyon’s updates on the PHSSEF will be issued as a series this August. The first update applies to “Round Two” of CARES relief funding from July 2020. During the rest of August, Toyon will be providing these other important updates:

  • Toyon’s Take on HHS Reports due February 14, 2021 – HHS is releasing funding and documentation reporting instructions by August 17. Recipients have 45 days from the end of 2020 (Sunday, February 14, 2021) to report COVID-19 related expenditures through December 31, 2020.
  • Toyon’s Take on PHSSEF and Cost Reporting – Key takeaways on the importance of filed cost reports and the PHSSEF.

 

In July, HHS announced a second round of $14 billion related to three targeted distributions from the PHSSEF.

  • $10 billion High Impact Payments

  • $3 billion Safety Net Payments

  • $1 billion Rural Payments

 

 

 

 


Toyon is preparing estimates on PHSSEF qualification and funding for hospitals nationally. Please contact Fred Fisher if you would like an evaluation for your hospital(s).

Fred Fisher — fred.fisher@toyonassociates.com
888.514.9312
Toyon’s Covid-19 Funding Resources


HHS Releases $14 billion of “Round Two” Funds
Listed below is further insight on HHS’s Round Two targeted funding distributions totaling $14 billion. Based on a current tally of the PHSSEF, HHS committed to spend $116.4 billion of the $175 billion, leaving $58.6 billion remaining in the fund (not accounting for the HRSA COVID-19 Uninsured Program).

$10 Billion Round Two High Impact Payments
On July 17, HHS announced distribution of High Impact payments eligible to more than 1,000 providers
reporting any of the following (based on data submitted June 15):

  • Over 161 COVID-19 admissions between January 1 and June 10, 2020.
  • One COVID-19 admission per day.
  • A disproportionate intensity of COVID admissions that exceeds the average ratio of COVID
    admissions per bed. Responding to an FAQ dated July 22, HHS states the average
    admissions per bed ratio (threshold) is 0.54864.

Eligible hospitals are paid $50,000 per COVID-19 admission. In Round One, payment per admission
was $76,975, and included a DSH add-on. High Impact payments received from Round One were
considered in the second distribution.
As of August 3,HHS distributed $9.1 billion of the 10 billion, leaving $900 million HHS will likely be
paying hospitals over the coming weeks.

$3 Billion Round Two Safety Net Payments
On July 10, HHS announced $3 billion in Round Two distribution of Safety Net payments. In this
Second Round, HHS acknowledged shortcomings of qualifying hospitals for safety net payments in
Round One. HHS accounts for recognizing an additional 215 hospitals as safety nets in Round Two by
expanding safety net criteria as follows:

  • Like Round One, providers must have an Uncompensated Care Cost per Bed measurement at
    or over $25,000. In Round Two, HHS corrected this measurement, “annualizing” this data, so
    hospitals with short cost reporting periods are properly evaluated.
  • Like Round One, providers must also have a profitability margin of 3% or less to qualify for
    safety net payments. In Round Two, HHS expanded this measurement by evaluating 5 years of financial data reported on the Medicare cost report Worksheet G-3 (as opposed to Round One whereby HHS evaluated one year of financial data). Hospitals qualified in Round Two with a
    “profit margin threshold of less than or equal to 3% averaged consecutively over two or more of
    the last five cost reporting periods.”
  • In Round Two, providers still must have a DSH percentage equal to or greater than 20.2% to
    qualify for safety net funds (no change from Round One).

$1 Billion in Round Two Rural Payments
On July 10, HHS also announced $1 billion in Round Two distributions for rural providers. In Round Two, sole community hospitals (SCH), Medicare dependent hospitals (MDH), and hospitals in small metro areas with fewer than 250,000 people qualified for payment. Hospitals are eligible for funds of 1% of operating expenses with a minimum payment of $100,000, a supplement of $50 for each “rural inpatient day,” and a maximum payment of $4.5 million. HHS also made payments to rural inpatient psychiatric facilities, inpatient rehabilitation facilities, and long-term acute care hospitals.

Back to top

FFY2021 Medicare IPPS Proposed Rule & Other Recently Published Rules

IPPS Proposed Rule – FFY2021

CMS-1735-P drafted on 5/11/2020; Published in the Federal Register on 5/29/2020

On May 11, 2020, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) proposed a rule that focuses the agency’s efforts on a singular objective:  transforming the healthcare delivery system through competition and innovation to provide patients with better value and results.  The proposed rule updates Medicare payment policies and rates for hospitals under the Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) and the Long-Term Care Hospital (LTCH) Prospective Payment System (PPS), effective for discharges on or after October 1, 2020.

The policies in the IPPS and LTCH PPS proposed rule would bring significant changes to MS-DRG weights, along with associated cost report changes, as well as tightening of Medicare bad debt policies, standardization of data collection periods for quality programs, and easing of GME program closure policies.

Overall, the proposed rule is projected to result in an estimated increase of $2.0B (or 1.6%) in payments to providers, with smaller increases for urban, Medicare-dependent hospitals and larger increases for Mid-Atlantic and Pacific region hospitals.

Comments must be sent to CMS no later than 5pm EDT on July 10, 2010 at the applicable address provided in each section of the Proposed Rule or submitted electronically at http://www.regulations.gov.  When commenting, please refer to file code CMS-1735-P.


Medicare IPPS Base Rates

CMS is proposing a base rate increase of 3.2% for hospitals, mostly driven by a market basket increase of 3.0% and the reversal of the MACRA coding adjustment of 0.5%.  A new budget-neutrality factor adjustment was introduced this year to account for the change in Allogeneic Stem Cell Acquisition reimbursement to cost-based.

Click here for the full base rate calculation table and comparison to prior year.


MS-DRG v38 Changes

CMS has proposed their annual recalibration of the MS-DRG weights for FFY2021.  Transplants and one extensive burn DRG (927) have once again received the largest increases, while other heart assist devices and intracranial vascular procedures with hemorrhages have experienced significant reductions in weighting.  A listing of the largest changes in weighting between MS-DRGs v37 and v38 are noted below:

Click here for a table of the MS-DRG v37 to v38 comparison.

In addition, CMS has proposed the following new DRGs for FFY2021, some of which were further subdivisions of previous DRGs:

Note:  New MS-DRGs 521 and 522 will both be subject to the special transfer payment adjustment.

The proposed fixed-loss outlier threshold for FFY2021 is $30,006.


Proposed Market-Based MS-DRG Weights Beginning in FFY2024

In an effort to reduce the cost of healthcare, CMS has proposed a radical shift in how it hopes to compute the weighting for MS-DRGs in FFY2024 and beyond.  CMS believes that by moving from the cost-based DRG weight methodology that was introduced in FFY2007 to the proposed weighting methodology that would reflect the relative market value for inpatient services, it can reduce its reliance on hospital chargemasters for determining DRG reimbursement.

Building on the Hospital Price Transparency Rule (84 FR 65538, 11/27/2019), CMS believes that hospitals will be able to calculate median payer-specific negotiated charges for each MS-DRG, as they will already be required to gather and publish much of this data.  CMS recognizes that this cost report data would become publicly accessible, but because only the de-identified median values would be reported, any proprietary information would not be exposed.

CMS has proposed to begin gathering this data from hospitals by making changes to the Medicare cost report forms for cost reporting periods ending on or after January 1, 2021.  Hospitals will be required to tabulate and report for each MS-DRG the median payer-specific negotiated charges for all Medicare Advantage payers and for all combined third-party payers.  The required cost reporting changes will be proposed in more detail in the Information Collection Request approved under OMB No. 0938-0050.

CMS is seeking comment on this proposed weighting change and its relative burden of calculating, as well as other issues that may address payers that don’t pay under MS-DRGs and whether or not a transition period to these new market-based MS-DRGs should be provided.  Hospitals that do not negotiate payment rates, such as federally-owned facilities, Indian Health Service facilities, Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs), and hospitals located in Maryland, would be exempted from this proposed data collection.


Cost-based Reimbursement for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Acquisition Costs

CMS is proposing to begin reimbursing on a reasonable cost basis the acquisition costs associated with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (i.e., when stem cells are obtained from a donor rather than the recipient).  Currently, these costs are included within the MD-DRG payment.  The proposed cost reimbursement will be similar to the methodology in which the acquisition costs for solid organs are reimbursed.  Providers will be billed and paid for these costs on an interim payment basis as a “pass-through” item.

Effective for cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 2020, hospitals that provide these services will need to begin following these procedures:

  1. Gather and report acquisition costs on Line 77 of the Medicare cost report
    • (Note: This has been a requirement for services rendered on or after January 1, 2017.)
    • Acquisition costs include registry fees, tissue typing, donor evaluation, costs associated with the collection procedure, post-procedure evaluation of the donor, and the preparation and processing of stem cells
    • Overhead allocations associated with these costs will also be allowed. CMS is developing a worksheet similar to Worksheet D-4 to allow providers to capture these costs, as well as to report charges by routine and ancillary cost centers.
  2. Formulate a standard acquisition charge, and include this charge on the inpatient hospital bill for the MS-DRG using Revenue Code 815
  3. Tabulate the hospital’s Medicare share of costs by developing a ratio of the number of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants furnished to Medicare beneficiaries to the total number of those same procedures furnished to all patients

Toyon’s Take:  Because these amounts will now be reimbursed on a reasonable cost basis, it is important that hospitals verify that they are properly capturing all of these costs and statistics in order to ensure adequate reimbursement. 

For additional information or assistance with calculating these amounts, please contact Robert Howey at robert.howey@toyonassociates.com.


Clarification of Long-Standing Medicare Bad Debt Policies

In an effort to clarify the rules related to the demonstration of a reasonable collection effort, CMS is clarifying the policies related to claiming Medicare Bad Debts:

  • Similar Collection Efforts: CMS is stressing that the reasonable collection effort required for a non-indigent Medicare beneficiary must be similar to the effort made by the provider and/or collection agency acting on the provider’s behalf, puts forth to collect comparable amounts from non-Medicare patients.  The hospital needs to have a consistent collection policy for all payers.  Hospitals should be prepared for the MAC to sample and review both Medicare and non-Medicare patients during audits.
  • Timely Beneficiary Bills: A provider must issue a bill to the beneficiary or party responsible for the beneficiary’s personal financial obligations on or before 120 days after
    1. The date of the Medicare remittance advice; OR
    2. The date of the remittance advice from the beneficiary’s secondary payer, if any, whichever is latest

(Note:  Reasonable collection efforts include subsequent billings, collection letters and telephone calls, or personal contacts constituting a genuine collection effort.)

  • Determining Uncollectibility: A provider must make reasonable and customary attempts to collect a bill for at least 120 days from (and including) the date the first bill is mailed to the beneficiary.  If the debt remains unpaid on the 121st day from the date the first bill is mailed, the provider can cease collection efforts and write off the unpaid balance.  If a partial payment is received within the 120-day collection effort period, the 120-day time period resets on the date the partial payment is received.  The hospital must continue to bill the beneficiary for 120 days.
  • QMB Liability: For Qualified Medicare Beneficiaries (QMB), the State Medicaid program must be billed.  If the State does not provide a Medicaid RA, CMS is considering adopting a policy that the provider could obtain and submit to its MAC some form of alternative documentation to evidence a State’s Medicare cost-sharing liability (or absence thereof).  CMS welcomes suggestions from stakeholders regarding the best alternative documentation to the Medicaid RA that a provider could obtain and submit.
  • Write-Off Procedures: All Medicare bad debt, including Medicare/Medicaid crossover claims, must not be written off to a contractual allowance account but must be charged to an expense account for uncollectible accounts (e.g., bad debt or implicit price concession).  This would be effective for cost reports beginning on or after October 1, 2020.  CMS had previously stated that this would be effective for cost reports beginning on or after October 1, 2019, so it appears that providers will be granted additional time to implement these internal procedures.
  • Presumptive Charity: CMS is also proposing clarification to the definition of presumptive charity.  For a hospital to define an indigent non-dual eligible beneficiary, the provider must apply its customary methods under the following requirements:
    1. The beneficiary’s indigence must be determined by the provider;
    2. The provider must take into account a beneficiary’s total resources, which include but are not limited to, an analysis of assets (i.e., only those convertible to cash and unnecessary for daily living), liabilities, and income and expenses (Note: Extenuating circumstances affecting the determination of the beneficiary’s indigence must also be considered.); AND
    3. The provider must determine that no source other than the beneficiary would be legally responsible for the beneficiary’s medical bill (e.g., legal guardian).

Toyon’s Take: The provider must maintain and be ready to provide documentation describing the method by which indigence was determined.  Once indigence is determined and there has been no improvement in the beneficiary’s status, the bad debt may be deemed uncollectible without applying a collection effort.  Providers should review their Financial Assistance Policy, and if presumptive charity is being used as a method to determine indigence, we recommend sending a comment to ensure that CMS will allow this as a reasonable method in determining indigence.

For additional information, please contact Dylan Chinea at dylan.chinea@toyonassociates.com


Changes to Wage Index

Based on the CMS proposed changes for FFY2021, the occupational-mix adjusted national average hourly wage is estimated to be $45.07, representing an increase of 2.10% from the prior year.

CMS proposed and finalized a policy in FFY2020 to reduce wage index high-to-low disparities by increasing the values for low wage index hospitals below the 25th percentile (or a WIF of 0.8420 in FFY2021). In FFY2020, CMS anticipated that it would continue this policy for at least four years, acknowledging that providers in these lower-quartile states would improve employee compensation within four years as a result of the higher wage index. Accordingly, CMS is proposing to continue this policy in FFY2021. Consistent with the finalized policy in FFY2020, in FFY2021 CMS will “fund” this policy by applying a uniform budget neutrality adjustment. The proposed low wage index hospital policy budget neutrality factor is 0.998241 (compared to 0.997987 in FFY2020).

In FFY2020, CMS also proposed and finalized a change to the rural floor calculation by removing urban-to-rural reclassifications from the statewide rural floor. CMS is proposing to continue this policy in FFY2021 so that state rural floors would be calculated without including the wage data of urban hospitals that have reclassified as rural.

As a result of the policy changes noted above, CMS finalized a cap of 5% on the decrease of any hospital’s wage index from FFY2019 to FFY2020. While this cap was set to expire in FFY2020, CMS is proposing to continue to apply this cap in FFY2021 and apply a budget neutrality adjustment for this proposed transition policy in the same manner as FFY2020. The reason for the cap in FFY2021 is a result of the Office of Budget & Management (OMB) updates noted below.

CMS Proposed Changes to Core-Based Statistical Areas (CBSAs)

The wage index is calculated and assigned to hospitals on the basis of the labor market in which the hospital is located, based on OMB-established CBSAs. The current OMB delineations are based on OMB Bulletin No. 13-01 issued on February 28, 2013, which revised a number of CBSAs starting with FFY2015 due to changes in 2010 Census data. Normally, Census data only impacts CBSA delineations every 10 years; however, OMB Bulletin No. 18-04 issued on September 14, 2018, contained material changes to the OMB statistical area delineations. Specifically, under these revised OMB delineations, new CBSAs would be created, urban counties would become rural counties, rural continues would become urban counties, and some existing CBSAs would be split apart. In addition, the revised OMB delineations affect various hospital reclassifications, the out-migration adjustment (accounting for employee commuting patterns), and the treatment of hospitals located in certain rural counties known as “Lugar” hospitals.

CMS is proposing to incorporate the revised OMB delineations from OMB Bulletin No. 18-04 in FFY2021 to “increase the integrity of the IPPS wage index system by creating a more accurate representation of geographic variations in wage levels.”

The proposed changes to current CBSA designations due the revised OMB delineations include the following:

  1. Urban counties that would become rural
  2. Rural counties that would become urban
  3. Urban counties that would move to a different urban CBSA

Click here for tables listing the proposed changes to the counties noted in #1 – 3 above.

As mentioned above, and to mitigate any potential impact to a CBSA’s wage index due to the revised OMB delineations, CMS is proposing a transition policy to apply a 5% cap on any decrease to a hospital’s proposed FFY2021 wage index from the hospital’s final wage index from FFY2020. This policy would be made budget neutral consistent with the last fiscal period in which revised OMB delineations were applied (FFY2015). The proposed budget neutrality as a result of this transition policy is 0.998580.

Click here for a comparison of current and prior WIFs for each hospital, which includes the proposed transition policy cap of 5%.

Toyon’s Take:  The transition policy as proposed by CMS to apply the revised OMB delineations is appropriate and consistent with past year’s where CMS had to apply similar revisions to the CBSA designations. The impact to urban hospitals as a result of the revised OMB delineations is minimal with the exception of hospitals in the Northeast, primarily New York-New Jersey, as a number of counties were redefined to new CBSA designations and “moved out” of New York City which historically has produced a higher wage index for such hospitals. The impact to these hospitals specifically will be mitigated in FFY2021 as proposed due to the transition policy; however, beyond FFY2021 the impact could be significant. Hospitals in these areas need to pay close attention to their wage index filings and consider any reclassification opportunities, and also, if a hospital in these areas has an existing MGCRB reclassification, it should review the reassignment policy as proposed by CMS to ensure the hospital is reclassified to the expected geographic area.

Other Proposed Changes Impacting Wage Index

  • CMS acknowledges an increase in the number of wage index appeals relating to MACs’ disallowance of wages and hours that hospitals believe are associated with Part A administrative physician time but which the MACs believe are not properly documented as such, or are associated with Part B billable activities, which would not be allowable for wage index reporting.
    • While CMS does not propose any changes to how hospitals are to document Part A administrative physician time, it provides clarification and specific instructions as stated in the PRM.
  • CMS is proposing changes to existing regulations to allow MGCRB appeals to be submitted electronically, by fax, or by other electronic means.
  • Applications to the MGCRB for FFY2022 reclassifications, as well as cancellations and terminations, are due by September 3, 2020. All applications and supporting documents must be submitted via the Office of Hearings Case and Document Management System (OH CDMS) consistent with FFY2021 applications.
  • A new measurement of occupational mix is required for FFY2022. The Calendar Year (CY) 2019 Occupational Mix Survey was originally due July 1, 2020 via email attachment or overnight delivery to hospitals’ MACs; however, CMS is granting an extension until August 3, 2020 for hospitals nationwide. Refer to the final CY 2019 Occupational Mix Survey Hospital Reporting Form available on the CMS website at: https://www.cms.gov/medicaremedicare-fee-service-paymentacuteinpatientppswage-index-files/2019-occupational-mix-survey-hospital-reporting-form-cms-10079-wage-index-beginning-fy-2022

For additional information regarding wage index changes or updates, please contact Ryan Sader at ryan.sader@toyonassociates.com.


UC DSH Payments

CMS is proposing a decrease to Medicare UC DSH payments by $534M (or 6.4%), to $7.8B in FFY2021.  This decrease is driven by a $1.2B decrease in CMS’s estimation of national DSH payments for FFY2021, as compared to FFY2020.  National DSH payments are calculated under the former “empirical” method without accounting for changes from the ACA (i.e., Medicare UC DSH) in the determination of Factor 1 for UC DSH payments.

CMS has four significant proposals for UC DSH in FFY2021:

  • The most recent available single year of audited W/S S-10 will be used for Medicare DSH UC payments for all subsequent fiscal years. CMS proposed to add a new paragraph regarding this change under 42 CFR 412.106, “Special Treatment: Hospitals that serve a disproportionate share of low-income patients.”
  • Hospital UC DSH payments (Factor 3) are determined from one base-year of W/S S-10 UC costs from FFY2017 cost reports
  • To avoid the duplication of UC costs, hospitals acquired under a merger partway through the surviving hospital’s cost reporting period will not have their respective W/S S-10 UC cost data annualized
  • The trim methodology for all-inclusive rate providers (AIRP) will be modified. CMS proposes to recalculate UC costs for AIRPs, with UC costs greater than 50% of total operating costs, by applying a cost-to-charge ratio from the most recent available prior year cost report whereby UC costs are not greater than 50% of total operating costs.

Toyon is in the process of updating our national analysis to assist our clients with the evaluation of FFY2017 data used for FFY2021 UC DSH payments.  We will be providing this analysis over the coming weeks.

Toyon’s Take:  CMS’s projection of the uninsured population for Factor 2 includes insurance enrollment estimates through 2018.  Given the extraordinary events of COVID-19, projecting national uninsured rates may necessitate a more recent consideration of the timeliness of these estimates.

CMS’s proposal to use a single year of UC cost as the basis of UC DSH payments (Factor 3) is a significant change to the UC DSH reimbursement system.  Including this year’s audit of FFY2018 data (likely to be used for FFY2022 UC DSH payments), CMS and its MACs audited UC cost from W/S S-10 the last three years.

It is anticipated these audits will be an annual cycle of reported UC cost on the Medicare cost report.  The UC cost audits are also aligned when hospitals are preparing UC DSH listings on current year cost reports.  While annual audits are in place, Toyon recommends hospitals report current year UC DSH listings with the intent of amending these listings before or during the W/S S-10 audit. Moreover, from our work with MACs, it is Toyon’s understanding amended cost reports are NOT required to revise UC costs (rather this data is being documented independently resulting from the MAC audit schedules into the CMS HCRIS database).  

CMS’s use of FFY2017 data for FFY2021 payments also indicates the Agency’s decision to bypass the use of UC cost data from FFY2016.  As providers submit UC DSH listings for FFY2018 and subsequent years, Toyon recommends hospitals consider the appropriateness of reporting reversals related to FFY2016 UC cost write-offs.  In other words, it may not be appropriate to remove cost that CMS did not use in the development of UC DSH payments.

Click here for the DSH Supplemental PUF data.

Click here for the Analysis of UCC DSH Factor 1.

For additional information, please contact Fred Fisher at fred.fisher@toyonassociates.com.


High Percentage ESRD Discharge Hospitals

As noted previously, CMS proposed three new MS-DRGs for kidney transplant services with hemodialysis (MS-DRG 019, 650, and 651).  Accordingly, CMS has proposed to add these three MS-DRGs to the list of excluded MS-DRGs set forth in 42 CFR 412.104(a) when tabulating the additional payment for hospitals that have a higher percentage of Medicare ESRD beneficiaries.  In addition, CMS will be removing from the list of excluded MS-DRGs two DRGs that are no longer applicable.

An updated table of the excluded MS-DRGs is shown below:


Graduate Medical Education Changes for Residents in Closed Programs

To address concerns from stakeholders that their policy for allowing hospitals to seamlessly absorb displaced medical residents from closed programs is too restrictive, CMS is proposing to ease the current policy to match actual industry practice more closely.  The current CMS policy is that the definition of a displaced resident is one that is physically present at the hospital training on the day prior to or the day of the hospital or program closure.

In reality, residents begin their searches and programs begin accepting those residents soon after announcements are made that the hospital or program will be closing.  This allows residents to transfer to their new programs at a mutually convenient time with minimal disruption to their training.

CMS is proposing that the key day would now be the day that the closure was publicly announced (e.g., via a press release or formal notice to the ACGME), rather than the actual day of closure.  CMS is also proposing that the definition of a displaced resident be expanded to include individuals who have matched with the closed program but have not yet started training.  The revised definition of displaced residents is summarized in the table below:

These proposed changes would apply to the FTE cap transfer for displaced residents as well.  It is unclear when CMS intends this new policy to be effective, but presumably it would be effective immediately.

As an additional effort to reduce the amount of personally identifiable information (PII) in resident cap transfer agreements, CMS is also proposing to no longer require the full social security number of each resident but rather only the reporting of the last four digits.

For additional information, please contact Tom Hubner at tom.hubner@toyonassociates.com.


Rate Updates for Sole Community Hospitals (SCH) and Medicare-Dependent Hospitals (MDH)

CMS is proposing that the hospital-specific rates for SCHs and MDHs be updated by the following percentages, depending on the hospital’s ability to meet the different qualifying criteria:


Rural Referral Center (RRC) Annual Qualifying Data

Hospitals have different options to meet the RRC criteria set forth at 42 CFR 412.96.  For those that do not qualify under the 275-bed rule, other optional factors must be met.  Some of those factors are updated annually by CMS and include the following proposed amounts:


PRRB Procedural Flexibility

Since mid-2018, providers have been able to file appeal documents electronically with the Office of Hearings Case and Document Management System (OH CDMS).  Over 65 percent of all new appeals are now filed electronically, and CMS is proposing the following changes to enhance these numbers and reduce the administrative burden on the PRRB.

Proposed Changes:

  • “Date of Receipt” to be changed to mean date of electronic delivery for applicable documents
    • PRRB will continue to apply to receipts the presumed 5 days after the date of issuance
  • “In writing or written” defined to mean either hard copy or electronic submission
  • No earlier than FFY2021, the PRRB may update the Board instructions to require that all new submissions for new and pending appeals be filed electronically using OH CDMS
  • Subpoenas must now be sent via certified mail to ensure accordance with existing laws

For additional information, please contact Karen Kim at karen.kim@toyonassociates.com.


Changes to Quality Programs

While CMS is proposing several changes to the hospital quality reporting and payment programs, none of these changes represent significant structural or procedural changes to the programs.

Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR)

CMS is proposing to progressively increase, over a 3-year period, the number of quarters for which hospitals are required to report eCQM data, from the current requirement of one self-selected quarter of data to four quarters of data.

In addition, CMS has proposed reducing the number of hospitals selected for validation from up to 800 to up to 400 hospitals.

Furthermore, CMS is proposing to require the use of electronic file submissions via a CMS-approved secure file transmission process for chart abstracted measure validation.  This proposal would nullify the existing submission of paper copies of medical records or copies on digital portable media, such as CDs, DVDs, or flash drives.

Hospital Value Based Purchasing (HVBP)

CMS is not proposing to add or remove any measures for the FY2023 and FY2024 program years. 

Hospital Readmission Reduction (HRR)

CMS is not proposing to remove or adopt any additional measures at this time.  However, in an effort to simplify rulemaking, CMS is proposing the automatic adoption of applicable periods beginning with the FFY2023 program year.  The period of data collection will become a rolling three-year period applicable to the FFY payments two years after the applicable period ends, as noted below:

Hospital Acquired Conditions (HAC)

Similar to the HRR program, CMS is proposing the automatic adoption of applicable periods beginning with the FFY2023 program year, as noted below:


Other Rules, Transmittals, and Articles Recently Published

Inpatient Psych Facility PPS FFY2021 Proposed Rule [CMS-1731-P]

(Display Copy available 4/10/2020; FR Publish Date 4/14/2020)

Fact Sheet Link

Federal Register Link

  • Per diem base rate increase from $798.55 to $817.59.
  • Will apply the most recent CBSA delineations and will have a 2-year transition for all providers negatively impacted by WIF changes.

 

Inpatient Rehab Facility PPS FFY2021 Proposed Rule [CMS-1729-P]

(Display Copy available 4/19/2020; FR Publish Date 4/21/2020)

Fact Sheet Link

Federal Register Link

  • Standard payment conversion factor increase from $16,489 to $16,847.
  • Will apply the most recent CBSA delineations and will have a 2-year transition for all providers negatively impacted by WIF changes.

Long-Term Care Hospital PPS Proposed Rule [CMS-1735-P]

(Display Copy available here 5/11/2020; FR Publish Date 5/29/2020) – Published as part of the IPPS Acute Care Hospital Proposed Rule

Fact Sheet Link

Federal Register Link

  • LTCH-PPS payments expected to increase by 0.9% or $36M.
  • Payments for cases that will complete the statutory transition to the lower payment rates under the dual rate system are expected to decrease by approximately 20%. This accounts for the LTCH site neutral payment rate cases that will no longer be paid a blended payment rate with the end of the statutory transition period, which represent 25% of all LTCH cases.

 

Skilled Nursing Facility FFY2021 PPS Proposed Rule [CMS-1737-P]

(Display Copy available 4/10/2020; FR Publish Date 4/15/2020)

Fact Sheet Link

Federal Register Link

  • Increase in unadjusted Federal per diem rates of 2.3%
  • Proposal to update the SNF VBP program and to change code mappings for case-mix groups

 

Back to top

COVID-19 Regulatory Changes

 
President’s National Emergency Declaration; CMS COVID-19 Fact Sheet
 
For more information regarding CMS Current Emergency response and issuances, use the link below:
 
See additional COVID-19 updates below:
 
Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNFs)
CMS is temporarily waiving the following requirements for SNFs:
 
3-Day Prior Hospitalization Coverage for SNFs
For those individuals who need to be transferred as a result of an emergency related to the COVID-19 virus, Medicare will waive this requirement when the following conditions occur:
  • Evacuated from a nursing home in the emergency area;
  • Discharged from a hospital (in the emergency or receiving locations) in order to provide care to more seriously ill patients; OR
  • Need SNF care as a result of the emergency, regardless of where the individual resided
Renewal of SNF Benefit Period
Medicare beneficiaries who have recently exhausted their SNF benefits may have their SNF coverage renewed without having to start a new benefit period. The 60-day post-discharge wellness requirement for a new 100-day SNF benefit period to begin will be waived.
  • Additional SNF care related to the COVID-19 virus will be covered without requiring a break in the spell of illness
  • Individuals who had either begun or were ready to begin the process of ending their spell of illness will receive up to an additional 100 days of SNF Part A coverage
Standard MDS Timeframes Waived
CMS will waive the standard timeframe requirements for Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and transmissions, which are normally due at the time of admission, within 14 calendar days after admission or change in condition, and upon discharge/transfer, among others.
 
Toyon’s Take:
Providers will need to educate their clinical and billing staff on these changes. How quickly will the MACs’ billing systems be ready to accept bills containing these changes? Billing departments may expect to have claims rejected at first and to require additional help to code and resolve claims.
 
Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs)
CMS is waiving the following requirements for CAHs:
  • Limitation for the number of beds to 25
  • Limitation for the average length of stay to 96 hours
Toyon’s Take:
This waiver will allow CAHs to accept COVID-19 patients in rural areas where bed space may be scarce. How quickly can CAHs increase staffing in order to handle an increase in patients?
 
Acute Care Patients in Excluded Distinct Part Units
CMS is allowing the following changes for housing acute care patients in hospitals:
  • Hospitals may be allowed to house acute care patients in excluded distinct part units, where appropriate, as a result of this emergency
  • The patient’s medical record should be annotated to indicate that the acute care patient is being housed on an excluded unit due to the emergency

Excluded Unit Patients in Acute Care Settings

CMS is waiving the following requirements regarding care for excluded unit patient in the acute care settings of hospitals:
  • Hospitals may be allowed to house excluded distinct part IPF unit patients in acute care settings, as a result of this emergency, and continue to bill for services under the IPF PPS, where the environment is appropriate and conducive to safe care
  • Similarly, hospitals may be allowed to house excluded distinct part IRF unit patients in acute care settings, as a result of this emergency, and continue to bill for services under the IRF PPS, where the environment is appropriate, and patients continue to receive intensive rehab services
  • CMS will allow IRFs to exclude patients, who are admitted to the unit as a result of this emergency, from the IRF population for purposes of calculating the 60% threshold that is required for an IRF to maintain its special certified status
Long-Term Care Hospitals (LTCHs)
LTCHs will be allowed to exclude patient stays related to this emergency in order to meet the 25-day average length of stay requirement.
 
Toyon’s Take:
Providers will need to consider whether or not it is safe to place patients with non-psychiatric diagnoses on IPF units that house more acute psychiatric patients and vice versa.
 
Presumably, CMS will consider both misplaced acute patients on IRF units and misplaced IRF patients on acute care units when calculating the 60% threshold during this fiscal year. The appropriate coding on the claims will need to be verified in order to identify these patients.
 
Coverage and Payment Issues
CMS is making the following changes to Medicare beneficiary coverage:
  • Vaccine:  Once developed, the COVID-19 vaccine will be covered in full under Part D
  • Hospital Stays:  Patients with the virus who no longer meet the need for acute inpatient care but are being quarantined in a hospital patient room may not be charged a private room accommodation differential and will not have to pay an additional deductible for the quarantine period
  • IPPS Payment:  Medicare will pay any DRG and outlier payment, including any quarantine time, until discharge, even when the patient no longer meets the need for acute inpatient care
  • Telehealth:  Patients who have an established relationship with their physician or practitioner may have a “virtual check-in” in any healthcare facility as well as their homes, where the communication need not be related to a medical visit within the previous seven days and does not necessarily lead to a medical visit within the next 24 hours.  This expansion of services will also allow patients to access their physicians using a wider range of communication, including telephones with audio and video capabilities.  In addition, CMS is granting Medicaid waivers to cover broader telehealth services for its beneficiaries.
Toyon’s Take:

If necessary, hospitals should create a new Medicare COVID-19 private room charge in their CDMs to reflect similar charges for both private and semi-private room accommodations, when patients are diagnosed with the virus.  Unless the patient is in an ICU room, it is unlikely that the charges from additional days will generate an outlier payment.

Coverage and Payment Issues

CMS is making the following changes to Medicare beneficiary coverage:
  • Vaccine:  Once developed, the COVID-19 vaccine will be covered in full under Part D
  • Hospital Stays:  Patients with the virus who no longer meet the need for acute inpatient care but are being quarantined in a hospital patient room may not be charged a private room accommodation differential and will not have to pay an additional deductible for the quarantine period
  • IPPS Payment:  Medicare will pay any DRG and outlier payment, including any quarantine time, until discharge, even when the patient no longer meets the need for acute inpatient care
  • Telehealth:  Patients who have an established relationship with their physician or practitioner may have a “virtual check-in” in any healthcare facility as well as their homes, where the communication need not be related to a medical visit within the previous seven days and does not necessarily lead to a medical visit within the next 24 hours.  This expansion of services will also allow patients to access their physicians using a wider range of communication, including telephones with audio and video capabilities.  In addition, CMS is granting Medicaid waivers to cover broader telehealth services for its beneficiaries.
Toyon’s Take:

If necessary, hospitals should create a new Medicare COVID-19 private room charge in their CDMs to reflect similar charges for both private and semi-private room accommodations, when patients are diagnosed with the virus.  Unless the patient is in an ICU room, it is unlikely that the charges from additional days will generate an outlier payment.

Provider Enrollment
CMS will be making the following changes to the provider enrollment process:
  • Waiver of application fee
  • Waiver of site visits
  • Postponement of all revalidation actions
  • Allow licensed providers to render services outside of their state of enrollment
  • Expedited pending or new applications from providers
Toyon’s Take:
Even though many of the steps in the standard provider enrollment process may be temporarily waived, providers should be prepared for CMS and State Agencies to revisit these applications and perform a more thorough follow-up review, after this emergency has passed. Providers should maintain all documentation related to any provider enrollment action until that follow-up review is conducted should that be necessary.
 
Medicaid Programs
CMS is allowing states the flexibility to make changes, such as the following examples:
  • Waive prior authorization requirements for fee-for-service programs
  • Permit providers located out of state to provide care to another state’s Medicaid enrollees who are impacted by this emergency
  • Temporarily suspend certain provider enrollment and revalidation requirements
  • Temporarily waive requirements that physicians and other healthcare professionals be licensed in the state in which they are providing services, so long as they have an equivalent license in another state
  • Temporarily suspend requirements for certain pre-admission and annual screenings for nursing home residents
States can assess their needs in the Medicaid Response Toolkit.
 
COVID-19 Testing: HCPCS U0001 / HCPCS U0002
Beginning April 1, providers can bill Medicare and other insurers for COVID-19 testing provided on or after Feb. 4 using the following Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) codes:
  • HCPCS U0001 – Medicare will reimburse approximately $36 to allow providers to bill for using CDC’s RT-PCR Diagnostic Test Panel
  • HCPCS U0002 – Medicare will reimburse approximately $51 for validated, in-house developed COVID-19 diagnostic tests.
Please refer to the link below for COVID-19 Test Pricing by MAC jurisdiction:
 
Other Recently Published Rules
 
Interoperability and Patient Access Final Rule [CMS-9115-F]
(FR Publish Date TBD)
  • Improved exchanges for dually eligible patients, which will change from monthly to daily (beginning April 1, 2022)
  • CMS will begin publicly reporting hospitals and clinicians that may be blocking information, based on their EHR attestations (late 2020)
  • CMS is modifying provider CoPs to require that electronic event notifications of a patient’s admission, discharge, and/or transfer be sent to healthcare facilities or practitioners in an effort to improve coordination of care (effective 6 months after publication of this Final Rule)

This information was current as of the time it was published.

Back to top
Toyon Associates Healthcare Finance

Here TO HELP

Receive a no obligation consultation on how Toyon can help make your cost reporting simpler, easier, and trusted.